Investment Institute
Macroeconomics

Testing the Separation Principle

  • 20 March 2023 (5 min read)

  • We think the drastic downward revision in central banks’ terminal rate is overdone
  • The current banking turmoil could trigger a steep deterioration in activity, but at this stage, some circuit breakers can still help.

Markets reacted to the continuation of the banking turmoil last week by drastically revising down their expectations for the Fed and the ECB’s policy rate, expressing their scepticism at the possibility that central banks could respond to the financial stability issues with liquidity measures alone, without altering their policy stance. While we agree that more prudence is warranted in the pace of tightening – we think that in the case of the ECB resorting to 25 bps hikes rather than the recent increments of 50 bps should be way forward - central banks are likely to balance the already tangible signals that inflation is taking too much time to decelerate with the mere possibility that the banking stress triggers a steep deterioration in economic activity and hence dampens inflationary pressure.

We don’t want to downplay the importance of what’s going on. In the US, deposit migration from smaller to larger banks would not be neutral from a macroeconomic point of view. Small banks exhibit in general a much higher loan to deposit ratio than their larger competitors, and they play a crucial role in a sector – real estate – which is already under significant pressure. Higher banks’ funding costs – if the risk premium drifts higher – would be another transmission channel (we find a quite tight correlation between banks’ refinancing gaps and their lending standards to firms). Yet, some circuit-breakers exist. In aggregate terms, small banks in the US have comparatively less interest-rate sensitive securities on their balance sheet than their larger counterparts (this was a specific issue for SVB). The solution for Credit Suisse found with UBS (and the decisive support from the Swiss government and central bank) implies a write-down of the AT1s, but bonds higher up the seniority ladder seem to be protected. 

Confidence always plays a major role in banking crises. In the 1980s, it took years to finally deal with the Savings and Loans saga (which bears some resemblance with the current US predicament). This time, public authorities are clearly intent on acting big and fast.

Testing the Separation Principle
Download the full article (564.07 KB)

Related Articles

Macroeconomics

Pesky Data

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 19 February 2024 (10 min read)
Macroeconomics

Deferred Confidence

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 05 February 2024 (10 min read)
Macroeconomics

Exploring a Miracle

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 29 January 2024 (10 min read)

    Disclaimer

    This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.

    It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date.

    All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document.

    Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.

    Issued in the UK by AXA Investment Managers UK Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK. Registered in England and Wales No: 01431068. Registered Office: 22 Bishopsgate London EC2N 4BQ

    In other jurisdictions, this document is issued by AXA Investment Managers SA’s affiliates in those countries.

    Are you a Professional Investor ?

    This website is available in English only and directed at professional, institutional or qualified investors. It is not suitable for retail investors. As such, some of the funds, products and services described on this website are not available for retail investors under the MiFID II (Directive 2014/65/UE). By pressing accept you confirm that you are a professional investor and agree to AXA Investment Managers' Legal Information and Terms of Use.